UAAC 2022 Paper: Collage Aesthetics: The elimination of the craft experience in collage, in Re:making : mending, materiality, and reuse in craft and design

Looking forward to presenting, Collage Aesthetics: The elimination of the craft experience in collage, in Re:making : mending, materiality, and reuse in craft and design, University of Arts Association Conference (UAAC), Toronto ON, October 28, 1:30 - 3:00

 Re:making : mending, materiality, and reuse in craft and design (In Person)

Keith Bresnahan (OCAD University)

This session invites papers that consider practices and theories of remaking, mending, and reuse in craft and design from antiquity to the present. Papers might consider practices such as visible mending, or kintsugi; intentional breaking and remaking; the incorporation of spolia or ruins into new buildings; cut-up, quilting, and collage techniques; adaptive re-use; upcycling; transformations of abandoned infrastructure into new designs; replacements, displacements, and substitutions, among others. What do such practices have to say about sustainability, originality, materiality, wholeness? How might these engage with larger imperatives today to ‘remake’ or rethink ways of being, to respond to crises both cultural and political? How can remaking speak, critically and fundamentally, to the nature of making, both in earlier historical periods and today?


Key words: Remaking; materiality; reuse; craft; design

G.2.1 Breathing Room – Jordan Bennett’s Souvenir

  • Ryan Rice, OCAD University/Onsite Gallery

This proposed presentation reveals the creative and curatorial process leading to Jordan Bennett’s solo exhibition Souvenir, which draws upon his inspired intentions to visit, activate and respond to the innovative design aesthetics embedded, woven and veiled in the richness and distinction of Mi’kmaq visual culture. The interdisciplinary and intuitive approach his work employs, celebrates a restored vitality of overlooked cultural expressions that carry elaborate Mi’kmaq cosmology. Bennett culls and contemporizes this visual language by reinterpreting customary geometric motifs that were embellished in highly valued Victorian-era antiquities of porcupine quillwork and basketry souvenir settler trade economies thriving on the east coast in the 18th and 19th centuries.

The result exhibits the artist’s creative practice and curator’s collaborative research as a conscious decolonial process to rematriate the memory and agency of (museum) collected objects he reveres by honouring his relationship to his ancestors; generations of artists who inspire him to warrant cultural continuity for Mi’kmaq visual traditions to flourish and their worldview to be witnessed.

keywords: Indigenous, visual culture, decolonial, curatorial, design

G.2.2 Slow time: the in between of making

Andrew Testa, Grenfell Campus, Memorial University

As a collector of things—things I pass, things I find, things that are forgotten, unnoticed and left behind—I have become increasingly aware of the things I discard, particularly within my practice as a maker. As a printmaker by trade, I have various failed prints, proofs, and trimmed edges that are typically discarded once ‘an edition’ has come to completion. But I have always dwelled on these snippets of progress/digress towards a completed ‘thing.’

During the initial stages of the pandemic, I did not have the opportunity to continue my printmaking practice. I did however learn to make new things/develop new skills, with an abundance of daunting, slow, and urgent time laid before me. I began sewing outfits (for performative processes within my art practice) and carving wooden spoons (for personal use and to gift to others), both seemingly calling attention the immediacy of the domestic space I became isolated within. And in both regards, I made, I failed, and I ultimately produced plenty of discards, off-cuts, and the residues of learning.

For this paper/talk, I wish to use my practice as a case study to investigate the wholeness of art practices, or more particularly, the in betweenness of making when a thing made is not seen as the pinnacle of the process. This paper thinks through failed things and off-cuts, wood chips and bark, and scraps of fabric and thread that were produced as a side effect of making (a side effect now paused upon to be celebrated).

keywords: off cuts, trials, failure, in between

G.2.3 Vibrant Things

  • Stephen Severn, OCAD University

I am proposing, in this talk, to present chapters from my OCAD University MFA thesis—Solid Things and Arranging Things—in which I describe my practice of re-using, upcycling, transforming, and replacing/substituting found and readymade objects using the processes of casting, assemblage, installation, photography, and prose. The account of my studio-based research, together with examples of creative/literary precedents, engages in critical dialogue with thing theory, vibrant matter, and queer theory to uncover how a renewed collaboration between humans and non-humans contributes to a politics of world-building. Through the development of a conceptual framework of ‘vibrant things’, I describe how all matter is fluid, non-hierarchical, and in relation and how an orientation to the vibrancy of things opens up possibility and different ways of being in the world. This talk will elaborate on how an art practice and the agency of human-object relation can participate in this shift as a special mode of relation to matter, materiality, and things—how collaboration with the material world can mend—can re:make—ethical modes of making and of existence.

keywords: vibrant things, thing theory, vibrant matter, assemblage, queer

G.2.4 Collage Aesthetics: The elimination of the craft experience in collage

  • Elyse Longair, Queen's University

Collage relies upon profound understandings of the images and materials being used, with the ability to see beyond the realities and meanings of the ‘original’. It also invites us to recognize relationships made possible through (re)imagining already existing images in the world. This paper focuses on the elimination of the craft experience in collage, encouraging the viewer to imagine freely the possibility of the image. With a specific focus on the important qualities of this collage approach (1) presenting the images as a flat seamless surface, (2) visually similar source material, (3) limiting the number of images used and (4) embracing subtly. I will present several direct comparisons between historical examples of works that I consider eliminate craft elements and my own collage works, focusing on the key qualities outlined above. The artistic spectrum will be explored through Max Ernst, Martha Rosler, John Stezaker and Henrik Olesen, who push the limits of how we think and approach the idea of collage.

keywords: collage, aesthetics, craft, imagination